On 2017-09-16 21:32, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi Ate,On Sep 12, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: 1. If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it, the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either: a. remove such notices, or b. move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project release, or c. provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or relocation of the notices. Now, in this case IMO the *SGA* (not the CCLA, which only applies for new/future code contributions) covers case c., e.g. provides the written permission for the ASF to remove/relocate the Oracle copyright notices.My understanding is that there is no distinction made between an independent SGA and a CCLA with Schedule B. They both grant the same rights to Apache.
Agreed, that also is my understanding. But the Oracle CCLA has no Schedule B, so their CCLA only applies to new/future contributions. And therefore I think only the SGA applies (and is needed) here. Ate
Craig Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
