I believe that's correct based on the comments in this thread.
Gj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 12:10, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ...I think we could enhance this with adding a
> > > "-notice.txt" attached to each library and adjusting the build to
> > produce a
> > > composite LICENSE and NOTICE files based on data from modules that are
> > > being built into the given binary...
> >
> > Note that NOTICE must be kept minimal, i.e. only include notices that
> > are *required*.
> >
>
> So, if I understand it correctly, if a ('convenience') binary is created
> for a subset of sources, then it should contain notices only for that
> subset, right?
>
> Jan
>
>
> >
> > Also, the composite notice/license must be built when preparing a
> > release, which is source code - so not only when building binaries.
> >
>
> > (haven't read the rest of this thread so far, just saw this)
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>
