I'm fine with either way. I was just wondering... --emi
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Junichi Yamamoto <[email protected]> wrote: > I see. I add the same one because it is already used in > o.n.swing.tabcontrol.readme.txt. > > Thanks, > Junichi > > 2017-10-07 15:13 GMT+09:00 Emilian Bold <[email protected]>: >> That looks good enough. Not sure how the license header is supposed to >> look in .txt files. I mean, we don't have to comment them in any way. >> >> --emi >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Junichi Yamamoto <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Emilian, >>> >>> OK. I agree with you. >>> Can we add the same license header as o.n.swing.tabcontrol/readme.txt[1]? >>> i.e. >>> # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one >>> # or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file >>> # distributed with this work for additional information >>> # regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file >>> # to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the >>> # "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance >>> # with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at >>> # >>> # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>> # >>> # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, >>> # software distributed under the License is distributed on an >>> # "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY >>> # KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the >>> # specific language governing permissions and limitations >>> # under the License. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/o.n.swing.tabcontrol/readme.txt >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Junichi >>> >>> >>> 2017-10-07 4:41 GMT+09:00 Emilian Bold <[email protected]>: >>>> README.close_semantics seems to have some meat. >>>> >>>> So I'd rather add the license header to these too. >>>> >>>> What do you say? >>>> >>>> --emi
