Hello William.
Thanks for testing.

>> William Beebe <wbe...@gmail.com>: 08.10.17 @ 21:27 <<
> Downloaded and attempted to execute mvn...
> 
> Failed with...
> 
> Running TestSuite
> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
> java.lang.Exception: Error
> at
> org.netbeans.html.json.impl.OnReceiveTest.performErrorJSONCallNoHandling(OnR
> eceiveTest.java:64) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62
> ) at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl
> .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelp
> er.java:80) at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:715)
> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:907)
> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1237)
> at
> org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java
> :127) at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:111)
> at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:767)
> at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:334)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:329)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:291)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:240)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:51)
> at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:85)
> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1197)
> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1122)
> at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1030)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGExecutor.run(TestNGExecutor.java:77)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGDirectoryTestSuite.executeMulti(TestN
> GDirectoryTestSuite.java:189) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGDirectoryTestSuite.execute(TestNGDire
> ctoryTestSuite.java:105) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGProvider.invoke(TestNGProvider.java:1
> 17) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62
> ) at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl
> .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray2(Reflec
> tionUtils.java:208) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(Provid
> erFactory.java:158) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFact
> ory.java:86) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBoote
> r.java:153) at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:95)

Is that a failure? When running the tests, this exception is printed, but then 
the build continues (on my computer) without issues.

> This is on macOS 10.13

I've just tested on my Mac Mini 10.12.6 with Java 1.8.0_102 and Maven 3.1.1 - 
the execution of "mvn install" got through and printed "BUILD SUCCESS"  at the 
end.

Can you tell me your Java, Maven versions? Maybe there is the difference...

Thanks again for trying.
-jt

> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I've set a Jenkins job up which can prepare a release bits of HTML/Java
> > API
> > and gives instructions how to build the ZIP file and test it:
> > 
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_vie
> > w_Incubator-2520Projects_job_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpk
> > KY057SbK10&r=tnLz5-vaI8x9g_xBBlFGf_ldS0-TN1M3i9fMP1FPWgk&m=YG4xzGgDrcyk2o5
> > fHnxRwjW9Yu1nyymXV6ENRKcVVmY&s=B2dDjkQBUc6Z4IgTFyahGz2UuH2Cxh48lxfdtr3Uu3k
> > &e= incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/
> > 
> > after a bit of configuration struggling the [build #16](https://
> > builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j-
> > release/16/) seems to deliver releasable ZIP file:
> > 
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_vie
> > w_Incubator-2520Projects_job_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpk
> > KY057SbK10&r=tnLz5-vaI8x9g_xBBlFGf_ldS0-TN1M3i9fMP1FPWgk&m=YG4xzGgDrcyk2o5
> > fHnxRwjW9Yu1nyymXV6ENRKcVVmY&s=B2dDjkQBUc6Z4IgTFyahGz2UuH2Cxh48lxfdtr3Uu3k
> > &e= incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/16/artifact/
> > incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip
> > 
> > It's md5sum is a45bda33200c208d0d837b0746a7dcce.
> > 
> > I've done the basic testing on Linux, as well as I tried to use the
> > version
> > 1.5 in Bck2Brwsr VM (works fine) and TeaVM which needed a [bit of
> > patching]
> > (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_konsolety
> > per_teavm_pull_304&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&
> > r=tnLz5-vaI8x9g_xBBlFGf_ldS0-TN1M3i9fMP1FPWgk&m=YG4xzGgDrcyk2o5fHnxRwjW9Yu
> > 1nyymXV6ENRKcVVmY&s=qa8AASAkNkfgF6EMp76nXhscdy9Md2jL2Vy8wnzpsbU&e= ). In
> > any case the HTML/Java
> > API seems releasable from my point of view.
> > 
> > This is the first attempt to perform Apache release of NetBeans HTML/Java
> > API.
> > As such there are almost no new features. Mostly just licensing changes,
> > bugfixes and other little tweaks. See Javadoc section about post 1.4
> > release
> > improvements:
> > 
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_job
> > _incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Dhtml4j-2Dlinux_javadoc_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHv
> > lZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=tnLz5-vaI8x9g_xBBlFGf_ldS0-TN1M3i9fMP1FPWgk
> > &m=YG4xzGgDrcyk2o5fHnxRwjW9Yu1nyymXV6ENRKcVVmY&s=aE6DiAcwK1P-20ylY9C350umn
> > q3CAfyA5vEGMSDv6jA&e=
> > 
> > Please take the ZIP file for a spin and vote to approve the release
> > and to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to publish it on
> > our site.
> > 
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
> > 
> > This vote shall close in the usual 72 hours.
> > -jt
> > 
> > PS: I am keeping my fingers crossed, hoping things go well.


Reply via email to