Hi,

Thank you for your explanation.

Junichi

2017-10-11 17:01 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> There's been a number of discussions around this, here's my position
> as an incubation mentor.
>
> 1. The ASF's policy for license headers is at
> https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>
> 2. As mentioned there, headers are not required for files "without any
> degree of creativity in either its literal elements or its structure"
>
> 3. Such exceptions should be defined in a single place to be practical
> - I suppose that's NetBean's main or parent pom
>
> 4. The fewer special cases the better, as those need to be reviewed
> for each release - and discussions about special cases might be more
> effort than just adding the headers.
>
> 5. If tools provided by NetBeans generate code, the result should
> obviously *not* contain an Apache license header. I suppose user
> settings can define which header the current user wants, if any.
>
> 6. If 5. is problematic for some types of templates, it's fine to add
> a temporary exception for those templates, covered by a jira ticket
> that describes the problem and gives it a unique ID. Fixing that would
> be low priority but I think it should still be considered as a bug.
>
> Hope this helps clarify things and happy to answer any questions.
>
> -Bertrand

Reply via email to