I believe so, yes. Gj
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM, ehsavoie <emmanuel.hugon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok even old dtds and schemas ? > That would be great :) > Emmanuel > > ---------- > Emmanuel Hugonnet > http://www.ehsavoie.com > http://twitter.com/ehsavoie > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Anything Java EE related is going to be part of EE4J, i.e., Eclipse > > licensed, which is fine from Apache's perspective, i.e., so long as > > something is not GPL(+something), Apache is OK with it. > > > > Maybe I've simplified things too much, but it appears like this. > > > > Gj > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:42 PM, ehsavoie <emmanuel.hugon...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Maybe this is not the right channel but in the WildFly plugin I use > > > schema2beans to produce configuration beans. > > > Current JBoss/WildFly schemas extend J2EE/ JavaEE ones which were > > licensed > > > by Sun/ Oracle under LGPL. Red Hatr would consider moving to ASL2 those > > > schemas but since they are extending the others I think those would > need > > to > > > be relicensed too. Does someone know what is the current license status > > of > > > those files ? > > > Cheers, > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > 2nd option is my patch for schema2beans to pull those files when > > generating > > > code which can be licensed under ASL2 (check with my legal dept.). > > > > > > ---------- > > > Emmanuel Hugonnet > > > http://www.ehsavoie.com > > > http://twitter.com/ehsavoie > > > > > >
