OK, that means, since there were one or two -1 on the dev@ list, we’ll need to start a new vote thread there.
Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd vote thread, together with how those items were resolved? Gj On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 11:02, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/13/2017 10:57 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In the vote thread: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > There are many +1s. > > > > In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed. > > > > Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly > to > > the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC > > or started from scratch at the IPMC? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Geertjan > > > > First you vote on the dev@ list. If that gets approved, you carry that > over to a new vote on general@incubator where only IPMC votes count. > IPMC members that have voted in the original vote on dev@ count towards > the 3x+1 you need on general@incubator. > > With regards, > Daniel. > >
