On 13/01/18 11:47, Gili T. wrote:
I guess I'll be the odd man out: the bigger the project the more relevant
cosmetic fixes are in my opinion. Why? Because in the 10+ years I've used
NetBean, bug fixes were more important to me than new features. Cosmetic
fixes tend to reduce the bug count at the cost of new features and I'm
certainly in favor of that at the moment.
Hi,
It's not about new features, it's about not losing existing ones!
Due to licensing issues we had to drop beans binding, hibernate, svn and
JavaHelp and, most importantly, nb-javac. I think our efforts should go
to try to recover as many as possible. jdk-javac is, from my
perspective, most important.
Also our efforts should go to try to recover the website and the wiki,
to adapt to JIRA and github, and to set up all tooling we need for that.
Once that is done we can concentrate in code review issues. But as said
I think users are first, so let's try to focus on them first.
Cheers,
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
