On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 17:37 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> No, this is a big concern -- this category B thing. > I've commented on the issue - but only one file is not dual-licensed and therefore Cat B rather than Cat A. > > I don't understand why these files were excluded via Rat, if there was > no problem with their licenses. > > As I understand it, we put files in Rat excludes that do not have an Apache license header? (may not entirely understand Rat internals! :-) ) So these should be excluded because they're allowed in the source but have a header we shouldn't change that triggers Rat warnings. Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
