OK, we have three +1 IPMC votes and it is over 72 hours since starting the
IPMC thread and the discussion in the thread has died down.

Can we wrap it up and release rc3 as Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta?

Thanks,

Gj

On Tuesday, February 13, 2018, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2018-02-12 22:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > been busy as well lately. The IPMC mail is flagged in my calendar since
> > days :/
> >
> > As far as I understood the only open Q is about the modded eclipse
> equinox
> > jar, isn't?
> >
>
> I see. Then it is something I should solve.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/257 - I'll work on the
> option #1.
>
>
> > For my understanding: is this a mandatory library or something which is
> > optional?
> >
>
> The answer depends on whether we talk about the NetBeans Platform or the
> whole IDE. From the point of view of NetBeans Platform this library is
> optional.
> -jt
>
> > Am 12.02.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
> >
> > OK, the IPMC vote has been up since Friday, i.e., on the
> incubator@general
> > mailing list.
> >
> > There’s a question there re a legal issue that we need to answer.
> >
> > Aside from that, what can we do to get the missing binding +1 (since we
> > have two of those from our mentors and need at least three in total)?
> >
> > Anyone someone can ping re this — also note we have 5 mentors of which 2
> > are actually active (and wonderfully helpful thank you Bertrand and Ate).
> > Should something be done about this?
> >
> > Many thanks and a good week to everyone,
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Friday, February 9, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It looks to me like we should go ahead with the IPMC vote, though
> ideally
> >> I think we’d add/correct the page referenced above with info to avoid
> these
> >> tagging problems before we do that.
> >>
> >> Any insights/ideas re this?
> >>
> >> Gj
> >>
> >> On Friday, February 9, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga <
> >> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Here's our release management page with instructions I followed in
> >>> putting the rc3 together:
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+
> >>> NetBeans+Release+README
> >>>
> >>> What could be added/changed/corrected in the above to avoid the
> >>> specific issues that have arisen with the tag -- and anything else to
> >>> make the above as complete as possible?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Gj
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:59 AM, John Muczynski <johnst...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> re: LICENSE being slightly different in the source tarball
> >>>> Here at SimuQuest, we've had similar confusions between files which
> are
> >>>> templates in version control but fleshed out in the release.
> >>>> Our solution has been to
> >>>>   * keep the templates in a separate folder
> >>>>   * use a templating language like the one in maven or Velocity
> >>>>   * try to keep comments in each file saying what it is and where it
> >>> came
> >>>> from
> >>>>   * not include the template folder in the binary release
> >>>>
> >>>> For us, this has been motivated less by tarball comparisons and more
> by
> >>>> wanting developers to modify and commit the "right" copy of the file.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hope the info helps.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind Regards,
> >>>> Johnny
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Johnny Muczynski
> >>>> 734-262-2045
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 10:30 Bertrand Delacretaz <
> >>> bdelacre...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I think LICENSE being slightly different (better actually, right?)
> in
> >>>>>> the source tarball is perfectly fine if there's a rational reason
> for
> >>>>>> it - you just need to reassure people that it's not a mistake.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.  Yes it's better - to clarify I meant aiming towards checking
> >>> in
> >>>>> and tracking history in git of the version in the full source bundle.
> >>>>> Something for a later discussion anyway.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For that you just need to be able to answer such questions with
> "have
> >>>>>> a look at http://netbeans.apache.org/release-management.html";
> >>> instead
> >>>>>> of re-explaining every time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Definitely one to add to the list of initial pages we were discussing
> >>> the
> >>>>> other day then! ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks and best wishes,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Neil
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Neil C Smith
> >>>>> Artist & Technologist
> >>>>> www.neilcsmith.net
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding -
> >>> www.praxislive.org
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to