On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:37 AM, Martin Dindoffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Of course, all of this is only my personal opinion. I'm not trying to start > a war here :) > Who says you're starting a war? :-) You've made a suggestion. Some people have agreed with you. Other people have disagreed with you. I've provided a few noted on ways forward for discussion. You are welcome to continue the discussion and focus on which of the different solutions we should focus on, etc. You've given thoughts on this already and I'm sure others will have ideas too. Thanks, Gj > > Regards, > Martin > > 2018-02-18 0:23 GMT+01:00 Neil C Smith <[email protected]>: > > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, 23:07 Martin Dindoffer, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > If there isn't such a thing present, the importance of supporting JDK9 > > > building > > > will only increase over time. > > > > > > > Why?! JDK 8 support will outlast JDK 9. I can see supporting building on > a > > non-LTS being a nice-to-have, but surely not that important? > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Neil > > > > > -- > > Neil C Smith > > Artist & Technologist > > www.neilcsmith.net > > > > Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org > > >
