I agree,

But we need to make sure that only agreed/safe fixes get merged into the
release candidate.  Whats the criteria to use?  Only accept blocking bug
fixes?

John

On 17 April 2018 at 12:10, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yeah, there are changes in the queue for the master branch that could be
> too destabilizing. To avoid something like that to negatively influence the
> 9.0 release, I'd suggest to create a branch release/9.0 and put only the
> safe fixes ready for 9.0 there. The wild development would continue in the
> master branch.
>
> Maybe this is an overkill, but it would make me feel safer.
> -jt
>
>
> 2018-04-17 13:04 GMT+02:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
> [email protected]>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is it time to create a branch for the release candidate?
> >
> > If yes, or after questions and discussions, who will do it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
> >
>

Reply via email to