A bit off-topic, but my experience all over the world is that there's a lot
of excitement about the NetBeans brand now. Far more people from around the
world are involved in the development of NetBeans today than there have
ever been in the entire history of NetBeans. :-)

Gj


On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Dmitry Avtonomov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah. I feel that so much damage to the NetBeans brand has been done in the
> last year just because of that transition that's it's better to release at
> least something. Even re-releasing 8.2 with no changes and naming it 8.3
> would be good at this point..
> I might be wrong of course.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:15 AM, John McDonnell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not a fan of the wording but to me, it reads like NetBeans IDE Apache
> > v9.0.
> >
> > It's a splash screen I don't think we should be spending ages on it since
> > it can change every release...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21 May 2018 at 08:59, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.
> > com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > For me, that's a perfect splash screen. The majority of those in the
> > > discussion on Twitter preferred that splash screen over the
> alternative.
> > We
> > > can change the splash screen for each release, so this is not
> necessarily
> > > the one we're committing to forever.
> > >
> > > In short, I think this one is ideal and we should go for it.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Christian Lenz <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > so as we have a release of NB 9.0 RC1 soon, we wanted to have a new
> > > Splash
> > > > screen as a bit of a rebrand under Apache as we already have an
> awesome
> > > new
> > > > logo. Unfortunately, there was no vote yet and I think, because we
> will
> > > > have a release very soon, shall we go with this proposal?
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DaU7oQHVwAAoBzp.jpg:large
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to