Apologies for doing it incorrectly, it's just the way I've been doing it all along.
Agree with the idea of the committer committing her/his own work rather than someone else. Gj On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Matthias Bläsing <[email protected] > wrote: > Hey, > > in theory you could rewrite history and force push an update, but that > will break all commits on top of that. > > I would create a revert patch, that restores the branch to its previuos > state. History looks a bit more complicated after that, but that should not > break others work. > > In general I would prefer if a committer commits bis work himself. He > knows besteht how to handle it. Squash-and-merge is IMHO for corner cases > and not for general usw. > > Matthias > > Am 28. Juni 2018 05:20:14 MESZ schrieb Junichi Yamamoto < > [email protected]>: > >Hi, > > > >My backport of fixes made after Apr 22, 2017 was merged into > >2ndDonation branch[1]. However, it was squashed. I think that we > >should not squash it. > > > >Can someone undo this? > > > >[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/607 > > > >Thanks, > >Junichi > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > -- > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail > gesendet.
