+1 on releasing AND Java 10 fix

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:17 AM Mark Ferguson <maggot.i...@sky.com>
wrote:

> Hello, I`ve been reading, watching and waiting, hope I`m okay putting my
> tuppence in.(I am unqualified, but know some.  Although I won`t be much
> use.)
> +1 on releasing and also on the proposed release cycle.
>
>       From: Josh Juneau <juneau...@gmail.com>
>  To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>  Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2018, 16:40
>  Subject: Re: Stability of release90 branch and moving forward
>
> +1 on releasing and also on the proposed release cycle.  I also agree that
> if the Java 10 fix is ready then it should be added to this release.
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau...@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
> > On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds great.
> >
> > A release cycle of February, May, August, November would be great, IMHO.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Great for me
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -Sven
> >>
> >> Antonio <anto...@vieiro.net> schrieb am Di., 3. Juli 2018, 22:29:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I love the three month release plan. Anyway I think we should choose on
> >>> which exact month releases should be done.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe we want to release on february (not december nor january), so
> >>> maybe we could release on february / may / august / november?
> >>>
> >>> Before releasing I'd like to make a PR for the website with the most
> >>> important highlights, we could add those in the banners and in the
> >>> "news" section. I may get this done by this weekend. Does that fit the
> >>> timing?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Antonio
> >>>
> >>>> On 03/07/18 14:31, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> To keep the release90 stable -- and we haven't discussed this or made
> >> any
> >>>> decisions around this point -- we should be very careful about what we
> >>>> cherry pick from main to release90.
> >>>>
> >>>> The traditional NetBeans way of doing that would be to say that only
> >>>> blockers can be cherry picked.
> >>>> Right now we have two blockers, both of which can only be verified
> once
> >>> we
> >>>> have the first voting candidate, so in principle nothing can be moved
> >>> from
> >>>> main to release90 at this point:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343308
> >>>>
> >>>> Since we're planning to release more quickly after the netbeans90
> >>> release,
> >>>> the fact that some things, i.e., some recent fixes, are not going to
> be
> >>> in
> >>>> release90 isn't a big problem since about 3 months after that we
> should
> >>>> have the next release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just verified the status with Emilian and we're ready AFAIK for
> putting
> >>> the
> >>>> first voting candidate together based on what is in release90 right
> >> now.
> >>>> After that, we'll verify together, i.e., quick NetCAT check, community
> >>>> survey, PPMC vote, IPMC vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hope everything is clear, if not, let's say so and get it done. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Gj
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>



-- 
Cumprimentos

Nelson Cazonda

Reply via email to