Awesome plan, thanks for your wisdom, enthusiasm, and support, Ken. Gj
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Kenneth Fogel <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I did get the unsigned warning. My plan for teaching is to use Java 8 > in the fall and move to 11 in the winter, NetBeans and EE willing. > > Ken > > Ken Fogel > Co-Chairperson and Co-Program Coordinater > Computer Science Technology > Dawson College > 3040 Sherbrooke St. W > Westmount, Quebec > H3Z 1A4, Canada > Tel: 514-931-8731 x 4799 > Twitter: @omniprof > > ________________________________ > From: Neil C Smith <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2018 12:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: nb-javac - was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 > (incubating) [vote candidate 3] > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 17:23, Kenneth Fogel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Curious to know why nb-javac is required? Was it always a part of > NetBeans and only just removed? Why is it not required for Java 9? > > It's a patched version of javac that has long been part of NetBeans, > but it wasn't part of the donation (for obvious reasons), so is still > LGPL licensed and can't be included. > > AFAIK, with Java 9+ the standard JDK version of javac has features > which make it more usable for editor support, so this can be used > instead. > > Did you get the warning about the signing of nb-javac? This to me > seems more of an issue with it that would be good to fix before > release. > > I also need to figure out how the best way to still bundle it in > PraxisLIVE, as I don't have the same license restriction - something > to look at soon when I move off 8.2 base. > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
