On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 18:24, Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 18:19, Geertjan Wielenga > <[email protected]> wrote: > > From another perspective, 8.2 and earlier are all Oracle products, licensed > > to Oracle, so that's up to Oracle to decide. > > But still open-source under CDDL / GPL! There are mirrors around, > including Emi's conversion to git > (https://github.com/emilianbold/netbeans-releases), and we as a > NetBeans community should ensure they continue to exist, whether or > not Oracle keeps hosting the hg repository themselves, albeit outside > of Apache officially of course.
hmm ... noticed an interesting thread on infra@ that might be relevant to this - On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 17:59, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:34 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is the policy on download pages that wish to link to artifacts > > that are not official Apache releases? > > Note that there's a subtlety here: there may be official releases of > the project done prior to it becoming Apache. I think we need > to distinguish between this and what you seem to have in mind. > > > My view is that only official release artifacts produced at the ASF > > can be published on the download page. > > We have a history of prior official releases being allowed. > So, does that mean we could host the archived older versions under their original copyright and licenses here rather than "elsewhere"? Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
