vote +1, to keep most of the domains for transition purpose and notes below:
Basically restated: 1. Consider the redirects as noted from Gj and also what Ken F. and Ed's additions of netbeans.com, .net, and .info for the reasons they stated above. 2. Keep fake sites away in case someone types .com/.net/.info. 3. We should let some domains expire that we don't want. - netbeans.org -- the standard home page - netbeans.tv -- a video/tutorial related domain - stagenetbeans.org -- a staging domain, good to have one of those - planetnetbeans.org -- the blog aggregator *Consider keeping* netbeans.org netbeans.net netbeans.info netbeans.com netbeans.tv stagenetbeans.org planetnetbeans.org *Consider removing these: what purpose would they serve?* devnetbeans.net devnetbeans.com devnetbeans.org devnetbeans.info *Remove* netbeans2.com netbeans2.org netbeans2.net testnetbeans.org testnetbeans.com testnetbeans.net Regards, Efrem On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:27 AM pblakez <[email protected]> wrote: > I would redirect the following to netbeans.org keep out some of the > mischievous > netbeans.net > netbeans.info > netbeans.com > > I think this would be a good entry point for videos talks etc > netbeans.tv > > pb... > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:25 PM Geertjan Wielenga > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Oracle donated 17 domains connected to NetBeans to Apache: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16946 > > > > We don't need all of them, Apache shouldn't need to deal with those we > > don't want and should let those domains expire that we don't want. > > > > Of the 17 listed above, I propose we keep the following: > > > > - netbeans.org -- the standard home page > > - netbeans.tv -- a video/tutorial related domain > > - stagenetbeans.org -- a staging domain, good to have one of those > > - planetnetbeans.org -- the blog aggregator > > > > Following Apache lazy consensus (https://www.apache.org/founda > > tion/voting.html#LazyConsensu > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>), i.e., no > > voting or responses of any kind are needed, except if you object. If no > one > > objects within 24 hours, we'll assume lazy consensus and implement the > > above proposal. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gj > > >
