Quick response!

I should have said proxy not redirect. That was what Daniel? suggested. No
changes needed on the Oracle side.

I realise we can literally bypass JBake, but just suggesting that for now
we keep it out of the main site gitpubsub process entirely until we're sure
what we do with it.

Neil

On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, 09:00 Antonio, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 28/09/18 22:00, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 20:07 Antonio, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> 2- http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/index.html
> >> Requires the DNS stuff being in Apache, setting up a repo and a
> >> gitpubsub, will lose previous (5.0-8.2) javadocs.
> >>
> >
> > No it won't. The idea is to redirect 404s back to Oracle, same as already
> > discussed with infra about the main website.
>
> Ah, I see, so we need Oracle to set up a "legacy.bits.netbeans.org"
> website with the current content, right? So that all 404s that reach
> bits.netbeans.org end up in legacy.bits.netbeans.org. Wasn't that the
> plan?
>
> I recall talking something about a proxy to make the whole thing
> transparent to the users, but I don't know the details. Maybe you want
> to lead this after wednesday?
>
> >
> > And possibly not /dev to start with, just /9.0 and /10.0?
> >
> > I suggested earlier not hosting the Javadocs under netbeans.apache.org
> at
> > least for now. We could rethink that later, but I think keeping it away
> > from JBake would be a very good idea!
>
> There's a misunderstanding here, I think.
>
> Hosting the javadocs at netbeans.apache.org does not require JBake at
> all. It's just copying the generated javadocs in a directory inside the
> "content" directory in the "asf-site" branch:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/tree/asf-site/content
>
> Adding stuff to a directory there and pushing to the "asf-site" branch
> should be good enough. I can set up a Jenkins job for this quickly if
> you want to see a demo.
>
> Anyway, shall we run a voting on the approach, including the javadocs.io
> idea from John?
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
> >
> > But, yes, is there consensus / disagreement to that approach?
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to