Yup. Having a fast pace in changing the major number (3-4 times a year!!) will quickly become annoying for those of use who use the platform to build application and need kind of stability of the RCP. We then no longer know when a major change that breaks our build will be introduced. I am really not fond of the new numbering scheme of Java, which make believe (our management for example) that you are always out-of-dated. We can't afford to change that fast in production tools...
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM Jiří Kovalský <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 Bring back the zero! :) > > -Jirka > > Dne 27.10.2018 v 13:13 Christian Lenz napsal(a): > > > Hey, I would like to bring this Topic up, Maybe it is a minor but yeah > still discussable. > > Often People Talking About NetBeans 10 or NetBeans 10.0. Often we are > using both as you can see inside of the Jira tickets and Mailing List and > public Chanels, etc. Our Branch is called nb100 which Points to 10.0 not to > 10. Like the history of NetBeans it is Always that we use *.0. 6.0, 7.0, > 8.0 and last but not least 9.0. (Branding, Splashscreen, etc.) Why did we > stopped here? > > > > We should be consistent. There is no reason to remove the *.0 after we > reached 10. So for me it is clear, #bringbackthezero we already have it, > only the Splash screen, About Dialog and some titles etc. uses 10, instead > of 100 or 10.0. It is not for me to be for or against 10.0 or, but we > should be consistent in using 10 OR 10.0 over the rest. > > My 2 cents. > > > > Cheers > > Chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
