Telling the truth, bug priorities are used very subjective right now.
Though AFAIK we have a good guideline somewhere on the old wiki which
helps to categorize the issue priorities, there are a number of people
not following that guide (I do not really blame them.)
We have simply no resource to keep the JIRA issues in mint condition.
I'd like to see more people involved in this. I think this is one of the
easiest way to contribute to the project (right after reporting a new
issue).
Also demoting issue priorities might offend some potential contributors,
so as long as it really do not hurt the process, I usually keep the
issue priority as reported.
On 11/9/18 10:31 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 15:57, Christian Lenz <[email protected]> wrote:
it would be nice, if we can have a look into the list of all criticals that are
open, after release of NetBeans 10.0:
...
Could be a Milestone for the next NetBeans Version.
Maybe some rethinking of how we use bug priorities? Shouldn't
criticals, used perhaps more sparingly, be candidates for cherry
picking back for an NB10 patch release?
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists