The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow 
night). 

Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation 
(adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for the 
notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license generation. An issue 
would be good to track that. Feel free to assign it to me, from my POV this 
should not block release though.

Point 2: the entries are foot notes for the table directly above them.

Am 18. Dezember 2018 11:51:47 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga 
<[email protected]>:
>Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
>
>For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
>minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else
>is
>in a good state.
>
>Gj
>
>On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell
><[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
>>
>> When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
>> 1. Near the end of the file it has:
>> platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/
>> SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
>>                                                 Apache-2.0
>> If a file is Apache Licensed it shouldnt be contained in this list,
>> correct?
>>
>> 2. At the end of the file it contains:
>> "Notes
>> -----
>> [  1] Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Sun Microsystems. All rights reserved.
>>
>>             Contributors:
>>             Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.0, Version 2.0
>(October 1,
>> 2009)
>>             Specification available from
>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> id=317
>>
>> [  2] Copyright (c) 2008  - 2013 Oracle Corporation. All rights
>reserved.
>>
>>             Contributors:
>>             Linda DeMichiel - Java Persistence 2.1, Version 2.1
>(February
>> 4, 2013)
>>             Specification available from
>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?
>> id=338
>>
>> [  3] Copyright (c) 1998, 2010 Oracle. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Contributors:
>> dmccann - December 22/2010 - 2.3 - Initial implementation
>>
>> "
>>
>> Is this correct for the Licence file?
>>
>> Other that that I see no issues, I was able to verify the keys, and
>build
>> the source, so when I get clarification on those 2 issues I'm willing
>to
>> vote.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

Reply via email to