> FindBugs is effectively dead, but SpotBugs has becomes its successor, and 
> supports up to Java 9 and is in active development.

To clarify, it seems that SpotBugs is a fork of FindBugs, cloned November 2016, 
with some light branding changes. So it's really the same piece of software 
from an IDE integration standpoint.

(The explanation at 
https://mailman.cs.umd.edu/pipermail/findbugs-discuss/2016-November/004337.html 
was informative.)

-- Eirik


-----Original Message-----
From: John McDonnell <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2019 5:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Find Bugs Integration - which donation?

Yes,

FindBugs is effectively dead, but SpotBugs[1] has becomes its successor, and 
supports up to Java 9 and is in active development[2].

My curiosity about the integration arose when I spotted this "new" project 
earlier (that being said I still use Java 8 - mostly for work purposes...)

[1]: https://spotbugs.github.io/
[2]: https://github.com/spotbugs/spotbugs

Regards

John

On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 02:59, Laszlo Kishalmi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Well, just adding some note: FindBugs is not maintained and cannot 
> process bytecode from Java 9 and above.
>
> On 12/31/18 3:01 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just looking at the transition page[1] and I notice theres no 
> > reference
> to
> > the find bugs integration (When you selection Source->Inspect and 
> > select FindBugs as an analyser) page.
> >
> > Is there any update on this? Was it missed in the confluence page - 
> > relegated to a later drop?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > [1]:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transition
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > John
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to