➢ If someone really wants more than 2 releases this year, then they really
➢ need to take on at least the two activities above.

Yes, I know and I will, I Need to find some time to do it.


➢ Totally disagree.  NB  __IS__ Java -- not PHP, not JS.  That plugins
➢ can be written to allow NB to do wonderful things for those other
➢ languages is irrelevant to NB versioning.

No, NetBeans not Java, NetBeans is everything what NetBeans supports out of the 
box. PHP, C/C++, JS, HTML/CSS etc. are core Plugins. Yes they are plugins but 
they are part of the core. And they are Plugins, because NetBeans is module 
based. Nothing of them is related to the Version. Neither the Java 
implementation nor the other core Plugins.


Cheers

Chris


Von: Chuck Davis
Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Januar 2019 22:42
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 11 or 11.0 ?

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:28 AM Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> TLDR;
> Please everyone, go away from Connection JDK/Java with NetBeans. NetBeans is 
> for years an IDE for a lot more languages. Java should not anymore the main 
> Language that is full featured supported in NetBeans than others that 
> NetBeans supports out of the box. First NetBeans can handle PHP very well, 
> better than JS or other Frameworks like Angularjs, Angular, React or 
> unfortunately Vue which is not supported. It can handle HTML/CSS/LESS/SCSS 
> and C/C++ and Assembler too. NetBeans is an IDE not only for Java developer 
> anymore.
>
> Yes, I can understand that binding was in the past but that doesn’t make 
> sense anymore nowadays.

Totally disagree.  NB  __IS__ Java -- not PHP, not JS.  That plugins
can be written to allow NB to do wonderful things for those other
languages is irrelevant to NB versioning.

As a developer I want to know that with NB20 I can use all the
features of JDK20 in my code.  Java will be changing significantly in
the future.  We need to remember that code written for JDK 11 will not
run, in many instances, on JDK 8.  Should that be reflected in NB
numbering?  Me thinks so.  At least I would like it so.  Without that
relationship developers will be required to do research to find out
what features can be used with the version of NB they may be planning
to use.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists




Reply via email to