Thanks for the mailing list heads-up! I talked to Toni and explained that 20 days silence in an issue resolution is undesirable. Hopefully a way to avoid that in the future has been agreed upon.
PR-1143 seems to resolve the licensing problem, so I've just merged it. -jt st 20. 2. 2019 v 4:46 odesílatel Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> napsal: > -1 (e.g. veto) to the revert proposal. > > Dne středa 20. února 2019 1:03:36 CET, Matthias Bläsing napsal(a): > > Hello all, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Matthias Bläsing: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 10:44 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > > > BTW, as we are not really going to release this build and that would > be > > > > true for the next one. > > > > Shall we play the release dance and upload everything to the staging > > > > area and create vote threads? > > > > > > we can skip this. We have a release blocker right in the LICENSE file: > > > > > > [JavaFX binaries are packaged with Apache NetBeans] > > > > > > @Toni, could you please have a look at the comments in the JavaFX PR: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/917 > > > > > > and the corresponding issue: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1995 > > > > I intent to revert the changes that were committed as the PR titled > > "Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917". > > > > The primary reason: the PR messes with the build process > > OK, as far as I can see build is slightly complicated. That is not a > reason > for revert. > > > and let it > > look like GPLv2-CP runtime libraries are pulled into the build. > > "look like" isn't reason for revert. > > > Secondary reasons: > > > > - the local maven repository is hardcoded to $HOME/.m2 > > OK, feel free to propose a fix. Not a revert. > > > > => Anyone using a windows installation with roaming profiles and a not > > so fast network will know, that having .m2 at the default location is a > > bad idea > > > > - the m2 url handler will not handle non Maven-Central URLs > > As far as I can tell, that is not a bug, but feature. > > > => There are other popular maven repositories (bintray), that might be > > relevant for us. > > "might be" isn't reason for revert. > > Best regards. > -jt > > > > While looking into this, I noticed, that the generation of license file > > needs rereview, as the per-nbm files also contain per-file licenses for > > files not included in that nbm. Maybe both problems can be tackled > > togehter. > > > > > > Greetings > > > > Matthias > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > >
