Thanks for the write up, the proposal looks great. I imagine moving towards a standardization on using Avro for record centric FlowFiles will make writing future processors a lot easier, too. All of the proposed requirements seem doable without too much trouble.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Bryan, > > The wiki looks good to me. A lot of stuff going on there, but I think it's > all good. Would love to see > a lot more support for Avro! > > Thanks > -Mark > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:09:24 -0400 > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Feature proposal: First-class Avro Support > > From: bbe...@gmail.com > > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > > > > All, > > > > Given how popular Avro has become, I'm very interested in making progress > > on providing first-class support with in NiFi. I took a stab at filling > in > > some of the requirements on the Feature Proposal Wiki page [1] and wanted > > to get feedback from everyone to see if these ideas are headed in the > right > > direction. > > > > Are there any major features missing from that list? any other > > recommendations? > > > > I'm also proposing that we create a new Avro bundle to capture the > > functionality that is decided upon, and we can consider whether any of > the > > existing Avro-specific functionality in the Kite bundle could eventually > > move to the Avro bundle. If anyone feels strongly about this, or has an > > alternative recommendation, let us know. > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/First-class+Avro+Support > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bryan > > -- Ricky Saltzer http://www.cloudera.com
