Thanks! I will be introducing the new plugin [1] for 0.3.0 and will be
updating all corresponding documentation regarding the minimum Maven
version.

Matt

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-376

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt,
>
> I am supportive of this especially given the nice boost it provides
> for people wanting to understand the structure/dependencies of a given
> Nar.
>
> Also 3.0.5 is from early 2013 and 3.1.0 is from later 2013 so we're
> still going a long ways back [1].
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> [1] https://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Matt Gilman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Awhile back I proposed a new maven plugin that would allow a processor
> > developer to easily see the provided dependencies their NAR would be
> > inheriting. This can become unclear if the processors depend on a
> > Controller Service API NAR (either directly or transitively through
> another
> > Controller Service API). After sending this email awhile ago, nobody
> seemed
> > opposed to moving to a minimum maven version of >= 3.1.0. I would like to
> > move forward with including NIFI-376 in our 0.3.0 release.
> >
> > See the original message below for all the details. Any objections?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-376
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Matt Gilman <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I am in the process of adding some functionality to the
> >> nifi-nar-maven-plugin. I'm hoping that someone has some guidance or more
> >> knowledge of Maven than I do.
> >>
> >> Background -
> >> NiFi provides classpath isolation using NARs [1]. A NAR can have a
> parent
> >> NAR. This is typically used to reference controller service definitions.
> >> For instance, if your processor needs to use the SSLContextService. The
> >> parent NAR maps directly to the parent classloader of the NAR in
> question.
> >>
> >> Known Issue -
> >> When developing a NAR that has a NAR dependency, you will need to know
> the
> >> transitive dependencies that will be automatically added the NARs
> classpath
> >> at runtime. By definition, NARs 'include dependencies' (like a WAR
> file).
> >> This means that traditional maven dependency tree listings do not show
> the
> >> transitive dependencies in question. Determining the provided
> dependencies
> >> becomes very difficult even for those most familiar. The update to the
> >> nifi-nar-maven-plugin prints this dependency hierarchy.
> >>
> >> Concession -
> >> The proposed solution is not 100% accurate as the framework dynamically
> >> injects some JEE/Jetty dependencies automatically to support loading
> custom
> >> UIs from any NAR. Additionally items in the lib directory are also
> >> automatically included in every classpath. I realize these are important
> >> but they cannot be resolved using Maven at build time due to the dynamic
> >> nature of the classpath at runtime (putting a jar in the lib directory).
> >> However, the plugin still has merit in helping developers understand
> what
> >> the implications are when depending on a NAR.
> >>
> >> Reason for this Email -
> >> I've created the plugin [2]. However, the component that performs the
> >> artifact resolution has moved from org.sonatype to org.eclipse as of
> Maven
> >> 3.1. I'm not sure how I would go about supporting both at the same time.
> >> Others have also had this issue [3] but I've not seen a solution that
> >> addresses the concern directly.
> >>
> >> Ultimate Question -
> >> 1) Should we be concerned with supporting Maven 3.0? The current minimum
> >> version needed for NiFi is 3.0.5 according to the Quickstart guide [4].
> >> 2) If we want to support Maven 3.0, is there are solution that can
> support
> >> both Maven 3.0 and 3.1 concurrently? Is there something that I
> overlooked
> >> or missed entirely?
> >>
> >> I'm hoping to avoid having to release multiple versions of the plugin.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://nifi.incubator.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/developer-guide.html#nars
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nifi/blob/NIFI-376/nifi-nar-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/NarProvidedDependenciesMojo.java
> >> [3]
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17685441/can-a-maven-mojo-relying-on-aether-be-compatible-with-maven-3-0-x-and-3-1-x
> >> [4] https://nifi.incubator.apache.org/development/quickstart.html
> >>
>

Reply via email to