+1 for a nifi-0.3.0 release tag. Signed is even better, but I don't
think I'd mind if it weren't signed.
rb
On 09/21/2015 06:35 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
The pattern I've liked the most on other projects is to create a
proper release tag, signed by the RM on passage of the release vote. I
don't recall off-hand what the phrasing was in the VOTE thread (if
any).
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Adam Taft <a...@adamtaft.com> wrote:
What's the thoughts on creating a proper 0.3.0 tag, as would be traditional
for a final release? It is arguably a little confusing to only have the RC
tags, when looking for the final release. I found this head scratching for
0.2.0 as well.
Adam
--
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Cloudera, Inc.
