Sean, Can you better define "completed by a non-committer"? Some cases to consider Is "a jira" complete when a patch is submitted or when it is merged into the code repository? If a patch requires a bit of work to integrate (and test), where does that fall? What if a patch provider doesn't have a jira account? What if integrating a patch a substantial rewrite of the patch?
I can certainly tell you what I did based on my ability to "introspect" our team conventions from jira, commit log and mailing list in lieu of a documented committer guide. Tony On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > When a jira is completed by a non-committer, who does the jira get > assigned to? > > I couldn't find a relevant section in the contributor guide (maybe we > need a "for committers" section?). > > If I wanted to get a sense of project activity (across committers and > non-committers alike), how would I get the best possible information? > Could I just look at git? Could I just look at jira? What if I wanted > to break things down by release? What if what I care about is review > activity? > > -- > Sean >
