Not very strong opinions on this? On Oct 30, 2015 10:53 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tony, > > I completely agree we should do this. A quick github search reveals > there are some nice utilities/processors folks have built for NiFi but > for which they're not necessarily going to submit them as PRs. We > should link to these as much as possible but we should also help folks > understand these aren't 'apache' things and are not of the Apache NiFi > community directly but they are good for users and developers to know > about. > > Perhaps a wiki page linking to these is good provided we have the > above sort of disclaimer and a healthy recognition such references > will become stale... > > Thanks > Joe > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > I wanted to start a conversation about projects that are good for people > > using or developing NiFi, but either can't or don't belong in the source > > tree. This could be due to licensing issues (for example not compatible > (or > > not yet determined if it is compatible (GPL [1])) with the Apache > License), > > or other thought provoking mild concerns like we're discussing on > NIFI-1074 > > [2]. > > > > I'd like to propose either capturing these on the website or on the wiki > or > > some other approach I didn't think of. I was hoping to find a good > > archetype for this type of documentation in another apache project, but > > didn't find anything I personally liked. If you have seen something you > > like or don't, I'd be interested to hear. > > > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1074 >
