Edgardo Yep. What are some others you'd be looking for? What we're basically doing is preferring a delegated provider model. Kerberos is one we plan to knock out as well
Thanks Joe On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Edgardo Vega <[email protected]> wrote: > Joe, > > Yes I was looking for username and password. Seems like NIFI-655 will setup > the base to allow for other username/password authentication providers > other than LDAP and AD. > > Cheers, > > Edgardo > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i conflated two different issues in my response so to clarify: >> >> I do not believe we're supporting basic authentication in our quest to >> obtain user supplied identify information at this time. >> >> I do know that once we have that data we're delegating to an identity >> login provider which we first have implemented to support AD/DS using >> LDAP. >> >> The actual details available thus far are in the branch for NIFI-655 >> as found here [1] and the higher level description of the goal is >> found here [2] but it is light on implementation details. Those are >> better found in the JIRA for NIFI-655 it appears [3]. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/NIFI-655 >> [2] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Pluggable+Authentication >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Edgardo >> > >> > We're tackling username and password based authentication in NIFI-655. >> > It will not be utilizing/supporting basic authentication but perhaps >> > you just mean uname/pword? >> > >> > The approach in NIFI-655 will delegate to a Directory Server/Active >> Directory. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Joe >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Edgardo Vega <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Wasn't there work being done on Basic Authentication? Just curious to >> see >> >> where that is along the development cycle. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> Edgardo >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Edgardo
