Agreed. I know there has already been a good deal of discussion about design on all these.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> wrote: > No qualms here. If they look good to go while the work and testing > surrounding NIFI-655 wraps up, they might as well be included. Would not > want to delay the release should any of these become protracted in terms of > iterations. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All, > > I was reviewing github PRs and wondering whether anyone objected to > > slipping a couple that look like they're very close into 0.4.0. > > > > NIFI-1192 (#131) > > NIFI-631 (#113) > > NIFI-1107 (#192) > > > > I should have some review cycles tonight. Lots of comments on them all, > and > > have good "momentum". > > > > Tony > > >
