James, reviewed, squashed the commits, and merged the PR. Thanks. What I failed to however was to close the PR. Can you please go ahead and close it?
Thanks Joe On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > James, > > Looks like you did great. Will take a look and provide feedback or merge > soon. > > Thanks again > Joe > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:09 AM, James Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hopefully I got the process correct - here's the links to the ticket and >> pull request: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1338 >> >> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/153 >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> James >>> >>> Would def take a contrib on improving the docs for invokehttp. If you >>> would like to submit a PR or just put text here let us know. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Joe >>> On Dec 31, 2015 9:09 AM, "James Harrison" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Looks like InvokeHTTP can do this - the docs imply that it only deals >>> with >>> > attributes/headers and doesn't explicitly indicate it can transfer the >>> > contents of the flowfile. >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > >>> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Joe Gresock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > I think InvokeHTTP will do the trick. >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:55 AM, James Harrison <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > We need to send data to an HTTP Endpoint which requires PUT >>> operations >>> > > > rather than POST operations. We currently use a forked version of >>> > > PostHTTP >>> > > > which allows selection of the HTTP operation. I'd like to contribute >>> > the >>> > > > functionality to Nifi which leads to a couple of questions: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. Have I overlooked a really obvious processor which can already do >>> > > this? >>> > > > >>> > > > 2. Is anyone else looking at this? - I can't find any tickets which >>> > > relate. >>> > > > >>> > > > 3. Should this be supported by: >>> > > > a. a separate "PutHTTP" processor? (probably abstracting most of >>> > > > PostHTTP to a common superclass) >>> > > > b. An additional property for "PostHTTP"? (which leads to >>> slightly >>> > > > confusing naming) >>> > > > c. A completely different way? >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > James >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have >>> plenty. I >>> > > have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, >>> > > whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. I can >>> > do >>> > > all this through him who gives me strength. *-Philippians 4:12-13* >>> > > >>> > >>>
