Yeah, absolutely agree! I intend for that to work but don't have a unit test 
developed for that yet. I will be sure that I do get a unit test in to verify 
that we can nest it.

> On Dec 31, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Ricky Saltzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 for making the znode a configurable option. Especially if we can nest
> it, such as "/nifi/<team>/production" and "/nifi/<team>/development".
> On Dec 31, 2015 3:49 PM, "Mark Payne" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> At this point I'm thinking that it would just be a configurable value,
>> defaulting to /nifi
>> This way, admins can easily configure it and that way they could view
>> whats in there, etc.
>> out-of-band of NiFi. Though I'm all ears if there's a better way of doing
>> this.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 31, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Ricky Saltzer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Overall this looks great, and will prove very useful as we try to scale
>>> nifi out.
>>> 
>>> When in clustered mode, will we have control over which znode the nifi
>>> cluster persists to? Or - do we want this unique to the cluster (e.g uuid
>>> of the flow)?
>>> On Dec 31, 2015 12:35 PM, "Mark Payne" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> I have spent a good amount of time in the past few weeks working on the
>>>> State Management Feature Proposal, described at [1].
>>>> The main JIRA for this is found at [2].
>>>> 
>>>> I have updated the Feature Proposal with more implementation details
>>>> describing the path that I have taken.
>>>> If anyone has any interest in reviewing the ideas and providing
>> feedback,
>>>> please do so, as this is something that
>>>> we want to ensure that we get right!
>>>> 
>>>> Also of note, for those interested and located in the MD/DC/VA area, I
>>>> will be talking a bit about this feature at the next
>>>> Maryland Apache NiFi meetup on Jan. 7.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Mark
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/State+Management <
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/State+Management>
>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-259 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-259>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to