MergeContent exists in the flow in several places.  I haven't noticed any
UnknownHostExceptions, though my grep of the logs is still running ...

-- Mike


On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Joe Gresock <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any UnknownHostExceptions in the logs prior to entering this
> state?  We had a similar problem where NiFi kept opening sockets to connect
> to an RPG and eventually ran into "too many open files" after several
> days.  We had to add the fqdn of the RPG host to our /etc/hosts file before
> NiFi would resolve it, and the problem went away.
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > Does this flow have MergeContent processor on it?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Michael Moser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the reply, Mark.
> > >
> > > NIFI-1577 isn't the cause because I don't think we were using any
> > processor
> > > that does ProcessSession.append().
> > > NIFI-1527 mentions a problem that occurs when NiFi starts, and our NiFi
> > had
> > > been running for several days.
> > >
> > > Setting aside the "Too many open files" cause for the moment.  Here's
> > what
> > > we saw when the NiFi JVM encountered Too many open files:
> > >
> > > ERROR [Site-to-Site Worker Thread]
> > o.a.nifi.remote.SocketRemoteSiteListener
> > > Unable to communicate with remote instance due to
> > > o.a.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException:
> > > o.a.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileAccessException: Failed to import
> > data
> > > from org.apache.nifi.stream.io.MinimumLengthInputStream@1234 for
> > > StandardFlowFileRecord[uuid=foo,claim=,offset=0,name=filename,size=0]
> due
> > > to org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileAccessException: Unable
> to
> > > create ContentClaim due to java.io.FileNotFoundException:
> > > content_repository/1/1-1 (Too many open files); closing connection
> > >
> > > This NiFi instance was using a remote process group Input Port to
> accept
> > > new files.  It appears after the exception that a flowfile exists in
> the
> > > flowfile_repository but the ContentClaim doesn't get a chance to exist
> in
> > > the content_repository.
> > >
> > > -- Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark Payne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tony,
> > >>
> > >> The two tickets that come to mind are:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1577 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1577> (Too many open
> files)
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1527 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1527> (ContentNotFound)
> > >>
> > >> Do these sound like they may be what is causing your issues?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> -Mark
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > On Mar 4, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > All,
> > >> > I wanted to describe an issue on a nifi instance we've been using
> > 0.4.1
> > >> on,
> > >> > and why diagnosing it and reproducing it may be difficult. This is
> on
> > a
> > >> > linux server, where we have a reasonably high load, and the error
> > happens
> > >> > infrequently, but when it does, it really gums up operations.
> > >> >
> > >> > At some point we get an IOException for too many open files. (with
> an
> > >> > awfully high limit of open files in ulimit, so not sure why that is
> > >> > happening).
> > >> >
> > >> > Some time later, when trying to read a flowfile in a processor, we
> > get a
> > >> > ContentNotFoundException because presumably a flowfile is pointing
> to
> > >> > content that was never written. When this happens, we basically have
> > to
> > >> > remove the flowfile manually (and if no one is watching at the
> moment
> > or
> > >> > the processor that reads isn't configured to handle this, or if
> you're
> > >> not
> > >> > using 0.5.x where you can selectively remove flowfiles from a queue
> > this
> > >> > can cause operational challenges).
> > >> >
> > >> > Because this happens so infrequently, I'm not sure if others have
> seen
> > >> > this. I'm not sure if something in the framework may need to
> > adjustment
> > >> if
> > >> > a content claim goes wrong, but I really didn't expect that a
> flowfile
> > >> with
> > >> > no actual content should be able to be created, which seems to be
> what
> > >> > happened (rather than the content being deleted or corrupted).
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyone else experience this, or know maybe if something in 0.5.X may
> > have
> > >> > addressed this (looking through the release notes, nothing jumped
> > out).
> > >> >
> > >> > Tony
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty.  I
> have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation,
> whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want.  I can do
> all this through him who gives me strength.    *-Philippians 4:12-13*
>
> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> www.avast.com
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>

Reply via email to