JoeW,

I'm not familiar with the Kafka processors, could it be a firewall issue?

JoeS

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting.  Appears the embedded Kafka instance is somehow not
> running there or not accessible.  Yet it is spun up in the tests.
> Even more interesting is that Travis-CI runs on Ubuntu (older version)
> as shown in the travis-ci build information linked to our github
>
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
> Release: 12.04
> Codename: precise
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Joe Skora <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Build worked on a Centos 7 system but is failing the Kafka tests on 2
> > different Ubuntu 15.10 systems.
> >
> >      Failed tests:
> >        TestPutKafka.testComplexLeftPartialDelimitedMessages:225 Expected
> > all Transferred FlowFiles to go to success but 1 were routed to failure
> >        TestPutKafka.testComplexPartialMatchDelimitedMessages:248 Expected
> > all Transferred FlowFiles to go to success but 1 were routed to failure
> >        TestPutKafka.testComplexRightPartialDelimitedMessages:204 Expected
> > all Transferred FlowFiles to go to success but 1 were routed to failure
> >        TestPutKafka.testWithEmptyMessages:174
> > org.apache.kafka.common.errors.TimeoutException: Failed to update
> metadata
> > after 30000 ms.
> >
> >      Tests in error:
> >        KafkaPublisherTest.validateSuccessfulReSendOfFailedSegments:167 »
> > ConsumerTimeout
> >        KafkaPublisherTest.validateSuccessfulSendAsDelimited:114 »
> > ConsumerTimeout
> >        KafkaPublisherTest.validateSuccessfulSendAsDelimited2:140 »
> > ConsumerTimeout
> >        KafkaPublisherTest.validateSuccessfulSendAsWhole:92 »
> ConsumerTimeout
> >        KafkaPublisherTest.validateWithMultiByteCharacters:195 »
> > ConsumerTimeout
> >
> >      Tests run: 18, Failures: 4, Errors: 5, Skipped: 3
> >
> > I'm still trying to track down possible the cause.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Still working on the validation, but I was able to get past the point in
> >> 0.6.0 on my Windows 10 rig that kept failing in unit tests.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Apache NiFi community,
> >> >
> >> > Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in
> >> > validating/verifying the release so they can vote.
> >> >
> >> > # Download latest KEYS file:
> >> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > # Import keys file:
> >> >   gpg --import KEYS
> >> >
> >> > # [optional] Clear out local maven artifact repository
> >> >
> >> > # Pull down nifi-0.6.1 source release artifacts for review:
> >> >
> >> >   wget
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.6.1/nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip
> >> >   wget
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.6.1/nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip.asc
> >> >   wget
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.6.1/nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip.md5
> >> >   wget
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.6.1/nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip.sha1
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the signature
> >> >   gpg --verify nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip.asc
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the hashes (md5, sha1) match the source and what was provided
> >> > in the vote email thread
> >> >   md5sum nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip
> >> >   sha1sum nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip
> >> >
> >> > # Unzip nifi-0.6.1-source-release.zip
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the build works including release audit tool (RAT) checks
> >> >   cd nifi-0.6.1
> >> >   mvn clean install -Pcontrib-check
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the contents contain a good README, NOTICE, and LICENSE.
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the git commit ID is correct
> >> >
> >> > # Verify the RC was branched off the correct git commit ID
> >> >
> >> > # Look at the resulting convenience binary as found in
> >> nifi-assembly/target
> >> >
> >> > # Make sure the README, NOTICE, and LICENSE are present and correct
> >> >
> >> > # Run the resulting convenience binary and make sure it works as
> expected
> >> >
> >> > # Send a response to the vote thread indicating a +1, 0, -1 based on
> >> > your findings.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your time and effort to validate the release!
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to