I think both are important. The bar should potentially be higher for including direct links to individual processors or content on the wiki since it could be viewed as a tacit endorsement of those specific items by the project. A link to the github resource on the other hand is more an endorsement of the overall thing, which is a lesser commitment I think.
I have a very obvious bias on this point, but I don't think the Apache project wiki pages always have a good level of community involvement and often aren't in view. There's a network effect to these sorts of github pages (excuse the silly naming by the way, the community set that standard) which makes them more accessible. -joey On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: It was so clear in my head - so wrong once written. I was thinking just a straight link to Joey's site but perhaps the wiki page with references to sites like Joey's makes sense. What do you think? Thanks Joe On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: I little confused about your proposal for "Externally Maintained References" in the menu - will it be a link to a page on the wiki? Or would it be another page CM'ed along with rest of the website? On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: Team, Bryan Bende gave a great talk on Apache NiFi at the Hadoop Summit in Ireland recently that I'd like to add to the apache nifi website videos section. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V77M-8ABrdE Joey Frazee is helping maintain a great github site for general ideas/approaches to using and extending NiFi. Seems a bit like a cool incubator concept for NiFi ideas. https://github.com/jfrazee/awesome-nifi I'd like to add a pointer on our apache nifi website under the documentation dropdown to point at 'Externally Maintained References' and it would like to Joey's to the 'awesome-nifi' page. I'll wait a few days (72 hours) and unless there is objection will assume lazy consensus. Thanks Joe
