It will be vey hard to suggest anything without any details. Have you looked at 
Kafka logs?

Oleg

> On May 3, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Sourav Gulati <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I am using 0.8.1.1 , I am not seeing any exception in logs . however, still 
> it is not writing to kafka. Any suggestions?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Sourav Gulati
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleg Zhurakousky [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Quick Question- Nifi Kafka
> 
> Hi
> 
> It was tested with 0.8.2 and 0.9, but it does not use new consumer API. We 
> are working on a new version of Kafka support slated for 0.7 release
> 
> Cheers
> Oleg
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 3, 2016, at 02:20, Sourav Gulati <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Nifi-0.6.1 is compatible with which kafka version?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Sourav Gulati
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, 
>> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is 
>> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please 
>> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when 
>> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, 
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the 
>> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, 
> privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely for 
> the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify the 
> sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impetus 
> does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of this 
> communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of 
> errors, virus, interception or interference.
> 

Reply via email to