Sourav,

Yes, the first thing that it will do is reach out to the node that you told it 
to contact
and get a list of all other nodes in the cluster. It will then load balance 
across them,
and handle failover, as it does today.

Thanks
-Mark


> On May 10, 2016, at 5:33 AM, Sourav Gulati <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Another question Mark,
> 
> If I have provided URL of one of the node and that node goes down. Will it 
> still work?
> 
> Regards,
> Sourav Gulati
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sourav Gulati [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Reg: Nifi Clustering
> 
> Thanks Mark for the information
> 
> Regards,
> Sourav Gulati
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Payne [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 5:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Reg: Nifi Clustering
> 
> Sourav,
> 
> Absolutely, Site-to-Site is a key enabler of NiFi and certainly will continue 
> to be supported.
> Whereas right now you enter the URL of the NCM, you would simply enter the 
> URL of any of the nodes in the cluster. Your instance would then reach out to 
> that node and get a list of other nodes in the cluster.
> 
> This will be similar to how the user will access the application, as well. In 
> 1.0, since there will be no NCM to connect to, you will be able to connect to 
> any node in the cluster, and it should be able to perform the necessary 
> functions.
> 
> Thanks
> -Mark
> 
> 
>> On May 9, 2016, at 5:15 AM, Sourav Gulati <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Team,
>> 
>> We are doing some poc with Nifi . IF successful, we may be using it in 
>> production some time in future. We are using site-to-site in our poc.  As 
>> Joe, in the upcoming 1.0 release work is being done to eliminate this notion 
>> of master/slave altogether.
>> 
>> Will site-to-site be still supported? Reason I am asking this is currently 
>> while configuring site-to-site we need to provide URL of NCM in Remote 
>> process Group.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Sourav Gulati
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew Clarke [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:41 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Reg: Nifi Clustering
>> 
>> Sourav,
>>  A single instance of NiFi cannot be both a NCM and a Node at the same time. 
>> In order to have both a NCM and a Node on a single server, you will need to 
>> install two copies of NiFi. One will be configured to be the NCM while the 
>> other is configured to be the Node. As Joe pointed out, these two instance 
>> of NiFi cannot share any listening ports (HTTP or S2S ports) in their 
>> configs.
>> 
>> Matt
>> On May 3, 2016 2:03 AM, "Sourav Gulati" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Joe,
>> 
>> This is what I am getting while running both master and node
>> 
>> IllegalStateException: Application may be configured as a cluster
>> manager or a node, but not both
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Sourav Gulati
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 6:45 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Reg: Nifi Clustering
>> 
>> Sourav,
>> 
>> The installation procedure does not differ.  However, you do need to be 
>> careful to ensure you're not trying to use the same ports for both the 
>> master and the node.
>> 
>> If you're having trouble go ahead and send some of the configuration details 
>> over and someone can try to assist.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>> 
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Sourav Gulati
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Joe,
>>> 
>>> Could you please provide steps of creating cluster on single node in
>> current version?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Sourav Gulati
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 6:28 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Reg: Nifi Clustering
>>> 
>>> Sourav,
>>> 
>>> Yes.  And in the upcoming 1.0 release work is being done to eliminate
>> this notion of master/slave altogether and move to instead that at any time 
>> any node can carry the responsibility of being a coordinator for the cluster.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Joe
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Sourav Gulati
>>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Team,
>>>> 
>>>> While creating Nifi Cluster, Can I run master and slave on same node?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sourav Gulati
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential,
>> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is 
>> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please 
>> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when 
>> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, 
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the 
>> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential,
>> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is 
>> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please 
>> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when 
>> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, 
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the 
>> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, 
>> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is 
>> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please 
>> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when 
>> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, 
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the 
>> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, 
>> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is 
>> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please 
>> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when 
>> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, 
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the 
>> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, 
> privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely for 
> the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify the 
> sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impetus 
> does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of this 
> communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of 
> errors, virus, interception or interference.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, 
> privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely for 
> the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify the 
> sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impetus 
> does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of this 
> communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of 
> errors, virus, interception or interference.

Reply via email to