Would you mind raising a JIRA as an improvement request and provide all the details and we can switch discussion there. I definitely do not want to ignore user feedback and experience, so let's discuss it there.
Cheers Oleg > On Aug 16, 2016, at 13:14, Chad Zobrisky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oleg, > > I see that now. I was thinking at the service level for the caching > factory to allow more reuse, but am unsure if that would even be a good > idea. > > Chad > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM Oleg Zhurakousky < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually it is using caching connection factory (see AbstractJMSProcessor): >> >> private volatile CachingConnectionFactory cachingConnectionFactory; >> >> Can you please provide more details what you are doing and what/where you >> are seeing this? >> >> Cheers >> Oleg >> >> On Aug 16, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Chad Zobrisky <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I ran into a case of many connections from a nifi instance to an ActiveMQ >> hub and thought about pooled/cached connecitons. I haven't seen any >> discussion of adding either a new service for pooled/cached connections or >> adding it to the current JMSConnectionFactoryProvider, via either >> ActiveMQ's PooledConnectionFactory or Springs CachingConnectionFactory, for >> reuse of connections, producers and sessions between processors. >> >> I would like to work on this and was hoping to get suggestions about how to >> best approach it. >> >> Thanks, >> Chad >> >>
