+1 and I voted for the JIRA ticket. Such a seemingly small change makes a huge improvement to draw the eye to important at-a-glance information. Of course this is only my opinion.
-- Mike On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Joe Skora <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 agreed. Much needed. > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Russell Bateman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I like your changes, Peter! > > > > > > On 08/23/2016 03:12 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) wrote: > > > >> I have the before/after Status Color images made up and listed in the > >> notes on the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2603 > >> > >> The screenshots are perfect, as there is some tweaking left to be done, > >> but it should give a clear picture of the effect the change would have. > >> One issue I haven't worked out is that in some of the screenshots the > >> "Issues" icon is the same orange color it is in the 1.0.0 Beta. It is > >> supposed to be the color shown in the Process Group/Process before/after > >> images. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:02 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: 1.0 Run Status Colors > >> > >> The discussion around the modernized UI goes back to start of the year. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1323 > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Redesign+ > >> User+Interface > >> > >> UI changes are notoriously exciting and horrible and for each person > they > >> might feel neither, one or both of these. > >> > >> Peter: Thank you for providing the screenshot. To help better > understand > >> your suggestion can you show a before, after, and provide some text > about > >> the changes you'd like? > >> > >> Your screenshot looks great to me but it also isn't obvious what > changed. > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Russell Bateman < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> As a consumer of NiFi and a developer of proprietary processors I'm a > >>> little concerned by what I see here too. In fact, I'd like to read > >>> some document supporting/justifying the UI changes, which is not to > >>> say that I presume to condemn them, just that I'd like to understand > the > >>> reasoning. > >>> The existing NiFi UI was already very good. > >>> > >>> NiFi rocks; I hope it will keep rocking! > >>> > >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I created a ticket and put in a link to a mostly accurate screenshot, > >>>> at least close enough to give you a feel for what I was thinking: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2603 > >>>> > >>>> Direct screenshot link: https://goo.gl/photos/RZzz45RGeTAmWwiC7 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:46 PM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: 1.0 Run Status Colors > >>>> > >>>> no big discussion really - just contributions. If you could kick off > >>>> a JIRA and attach a screenshot of what you have in mind that could > >>>> help the discussion move along. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) > >>>> <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> We've been playing with NiFi 1.0 and of course the new theme/layout > >>>>> is a > >>>>> > >>>> big change. > >>>> > >>>>> One thing we don't particularly care for is the bland gray > >>>>> > >>>> Running/Stopped/Disabled colors. I would be willing to have them > >>>> bland in the header, but on the Processor/Process Group level I feel > >>>> they really need to be Green/Red/whatever color. > >>>> > >>>>> I would be happy to submit the change, but I wanted to make sure > >>>>> there > >>>>> > >>>> hadn't been some kind heated discussion over colors or lack thereof > >>>> before putting in a PR. > >>>> > >>>> > > >
