Yes, but as I never regain control after throwing ProcessorErrorin onTrigger(), I don't get a chance to look at the resulting log in my unit test. I must still be missing something here?

On 08/25/2016 11:29 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
Russ,

You can call runner.getLogger() which gives you a MockComponentLog:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockComponentLog.java.
 From that you can get your messages and check if you logged the
specific one(s) you care about.

Regards,
Matt

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Russell Bateman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Matt,

Thank you for replying. It extends AbstractProcessor:

public class X12MessageRouter extends AbstractProcessor
{
   @Override
   public void onTrigger( final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession
session ) throws ProcessException
   {
     FlowFile flowfile = session.get();
     ...

No, you're right, I don't want to propagate exceptions outside the
processor. I wasn't even thinking about that. I really just wanted to test
that I'm throwing ProcessorException with the specific message for the
specific reason I'm throwing it. Do you have a suggestion based on this?

Thanks,

Russ


On 08/25/2016 11:12 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
Does your processor extend AbstractProcessor or
AbstractSessionFactoryProcessor? If the former, then all throwables
get caught by the onTrigger method:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/AbstractProcessor.java

Are you sure you want such exceptions to propagate out of the
processor? Usually you would route a flow file to some failure or
retry relationship, or rollback the session (which is what
AbstractProcessor does). This keeps the integrity of the framework
rather than an exception escaping into the wild.

Regards,
Matt

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Russell Bateman
<[email protected]> wrote:
  From my custom processor, I'm throwing a ProcessException that never
reaches
my catch in the JUnit test. I already have several other JUnit tests
working
on this processor; this is the remaining wiggle I want to test.

I might be blind here, but I can't see what's wrong. Any comment will be
useful.

Thanks,

Russ

Here's the tail-end of my processor'sonTrigger() method:

      ...

      try
      {
        X12Simple x12 = ( X12Simple ) parser.parse( is.get() );
        ...

        session.transfer( newFlowfile, resultingRelationship );
      }
      catch( FormatException e ) *// this exception is caught--was thrown
in
X12 parser as expected!*
      {
        session.remove( newFlowfile );
*      throw new ProcessException( e + " (the content is unparsable as an
X12 message)" );*
      }
      catch( IOException e )
      {
        session.remove( newFlowfile );
        throw new ProcessException( e );
      }
    }
    finally
    {
      session.transfer( flowfile, ORIGINAL );
    }
}


And here's the JUnit test case for now:

@Test
public void testOnTriggerCompleteCrap()
{
    TestRunner runner = TestRunners.newTestRunner( new X12MessageRouter()
);

    final int         ONE     = 1;
    final InputStream MESSAGE = new ByteArrayInputStream( _CRAP.getBytes()
);

    Map< String, String > flowFileAttributes = new HashMap<>();
    flowFileAttributes.put( "testname", "X12 Message Router Unit Test" );

    runner.setValidateExpressionUsage( false );
    runner.enqueue( MESSAGE, flowFileAttributes );

    try
    {
*runner.run( ONE ); **// (exception will happen under here)*
      runner.assertQueueEmpty();
      List< MockFlowFile > results = runner.getFlowFilesForRelationship(
X12MessageRouter.NONE );
    }
    catch( ProcessException e )
    {
      int x = 9; *// (never caught at breakpoint set here)*
    }
}


Reply via email to