Makes good sense to me. On Nov 7, 2016 5:39 PM, "Michael Moser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> All, > > I would like to propose a fundamental change to processor validation based > on observations in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2996. I > would > like to validate processors only when they are in the STOPPED state. > > The properties on a processor in the RUNNING state should always be valid, > else you should not have been able to start the processor. A processor in > the DISABLED statue doesn't show validation results, so it seems a waste to > validate its properties. > > The reason I'm proposing this change is because the NiFi UI slows down as > you add more processors and controller services to the graph. Beyond common > sense expectations that this would be true, it appears that processor > validation is a significant part of the 'cost' on the server when > responding to REST API requests. Some details from my testing are in the > JIRA ticket. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > -- Mike >
