Joe,

+1 (binding).

Verified signature, built with mvn -Pcontrib (success), built with -Pmapr
(non-blocking failure on range processors - will raise JIRA), performed a
rolling upgrade into secure test cluster (success with no side effect),
processed a few GB of generated data (using multiple ingestion processors).
TTBOMK LICENSE and NOTICE seem ok.

Not sure if anyone mentioned by the dis URLs point to the wrong version?



On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Apache NiFi Community,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi,
> nifi-1.1.0.
>
> The source release zip and convenience binaries, including signatures
> and digests can be found at:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/1.0.0-rc2/
>
> The Git tag is nifi-1.1.0-RC2
> The Git commit hash is f61e42c65e1c2387591ee368c2148cd5bda646bd
> * https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=
> f61e42c65e1c2387591ee368c2148cd5bda646bd
> * https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/f61e42c65e1c2387591ee368c2148c
> d5bda646bd
>
> Checksums of nifi-1.1.0-source-release.zip:
> MD5: 371fb856d9c3947603239ea98f171f6f
> SHA1: 532c2e14e915dfa522254745bbc068aa6620babb
> SHA256: dd1d0569f209fd7f179b85a50fe4bf81b3d850c79b13d32cad88982a8234a719
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>   https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/joewitt
>
> KEYS file available here:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
>
> 268 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12316020&version=12337875
>
>
> Release note highlights can be found here:
>   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/
> Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version1.1.0
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test. Then
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-1.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks!
>

Reply via email to