+1 On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Jeremy Dyer <jdy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marc - I responded in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-217 > directly but I think this is a good idea. The sooner we do this the less > painful it will be. I also like the additional namespaces like *io and > *processors that you lay out in the JIRA. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Marc <phroc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Good timezone appropriate salutation, > > > > I'd like to move the MiNiFi-CPP agent to a more controlled namespace, > > namely org::apache::nifi::minifi . In an upcoming PR I'll introduce a > > directory for I/O activities and using namespaces will help better > isolate > > and encapsulate the duties of the code; however, I wanted to make sure > > everyone is okay with these namespace changes. > > > > First and foremost, the question would be: will this impact anyone? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-217 > > > > I wouldn't immediately make the change, to avoid impacting devs who are > > expecting the global namespace. I put an arbitrary estimate in the ticket > > to reflect notice being given before applying the change to the mainline. > > > > Feel free to comment on the ticket with objections and/or timeline > > requests. This is pretty low priority, but I wanted to provide sufficient > > notice. > > > > Best Regards, > > Marc Parisi > > >
