+1 (non-binding)

Built from src on OSX Sierra 10.12.3 (16D32), all tests pass
Verified sigs and hashes.
Ran sample flow.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Bryan Rosander <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signature, hashes
> Contrib-check build against fresh local repo
> Simple flow on 3 node cluster
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> James
>>
>> It is simply enough that someone volunteered to RM the release.  If time is
>> available to help review/vote then great.  Same with the 1.x release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2017 2:59 PM, "James Wing" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > The unifying theme of 0.7.2 and 1.1.2 appears to be NIFI-3487 "Refactor
>> > user formatting".  Is this urgent?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3487
>> > https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/bd88e4335ad151592f1310996e9a05
>> > 13b7f0829a
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > James
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Mike,
>> > >
>> > > You're absolutely right that there are some good fixes to be included
>> > > in an upcoming release.  There is no reason someone couldn't put
>> > > together an 0.7.3.
>> > >
>> > > This is just something that we're wanting resolved and have the energy
>> > > to push forward and doesn't require additional testing as inclusion of
>> > > other items would.
>> > >
>> > > Please by no means see this as a deterrent to progression on an 0.7.3.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Joe
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Michael Moser <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > I'm sad that 0.7.2 does not contain some of the other bug fixes
>> > currently
>> > > > on the 0.x branch.  It doesn't seem like it would have cost very much
>> > to
>> > > > just include them.
>> > > >
>> > > > +0 (non binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Mike
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Andy LoPresto <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hello,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>> Apache
>> > > NiFi
>> > > >> nifi-0.7.2.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachenifi-1099
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The Git tag is nifi-0.7.2-RC1
>> > > >> The Git commit ID is 831ac6939df7d418cadb336eedb4e09fb97541a1
>> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=
>> > > >> 831ac6939df7d418cadb336eedb4e09fb97541a1
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Checksums of nifi-0.7.2-source-release.zip:
>> > > >> MD5: efe9ea1cf0698a57a6829fe3829fc136
>> > > >> SHA1: aee51164af34394c7017dae491b239a88b614865
>> > > >> SHA256: 8cd02675003fca837ea0092b622560
>> 0a4700b905e5214a751ae7ff833263
>> > > 193b
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/alopresto.asc
>> > > >>
>> > > >> KEYS file available here:
>> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> > > >> version=12339601&projectId=12316020
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Release note highlights can be found here:
>> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/
>> > > >> Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version0.7.2
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The vote will be open for 96 hours (over holiday weekend).
>> > > >> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
>> items
>> > > >> including checking hashes, signatures, build
>> > > >> from source, and test.  The please vote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-0.7.2
>> > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because…
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Andy LoPresto
>> > > >> [email protected]
>> > > >> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>> > > >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to