Worth considering, this twitter post has been circulating the blogosphere: https://twitter.com/agentdero/status/889582259522736128
I'd like to ensure we don't forget other means of providing patches (attaching a patch to a ticket). While github is convenient to some, using it as the sole source of providing contributions may be off-putting to some. On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a strong +0. I don't think think it is a huge step forward, but it > isn't a step back either. > > On Jul 28, 2017 5:42 PM, "Andy LoPresto" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to enable gitbox. >> >> Andy LoPresto >> [email protected] >> *[email protected] <[email protected]>* >> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 >> >> On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1, I meant to bring this up after I saw the conversation on the Apache >> Streams list. Seems like a great improvement to the workflow! >> >> >> On Jul 28, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 to move to gitbox >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Excellent. Thanks for the input, Suneel. The before and after links are >> especially helpful. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a >> release immediately. >> >> Yes, the PR commit workflow is lot simpler now with gitbox (just a button >> click). >> >> I would definitely recommend moving Nifi to gitbox, if anything it makes >> >> a >> >> committer's life lot easier. >> >> >> Before Gitbox, this is how PRs were merged: >> >> http://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html >> >> After Gitbox, this is how it will be: >> >> http://opennlp.apache.org/using-git.html >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hey folks, >> >> I saw mention on the Incubator general mailing list about Gitbox [1]. >> >> From >> >> that message it seems like it would help considerably with some of the >> maintenance tasks we perform on the repository. Has anyone in the >> community used it on another project and have any opinions on it? >> >> Doing some searching, I was able to find some discussion from the >> >> Accumulo >> >> project [2]. >> >> With my very basic understanding of the service, it seems like it would >> >> be >> >> a welcomed bit of functionality. >> >> Is this something we think is worth exploring further and enabling on >> >> our >> >> repositories? >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Znkiyqnxqzryecv >> [2] http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS- >> GitBox-td21160.html >> >> >> >> >>
