No I do see how this could be convenient in some cases. My comment was more: you can certainly submit a PR for that feature, but it'll need to be clearly documented using the appropriate annotations, documentation, and property descriptions.
2018-03-20 10:20 GMT+01:00 Jorge Machado <[email protected]>: > Hi Pierre, I’m aware of that. So This means the change would not be > accepted correct ? > > Regards > > Jorge Machado > > > > > > > On 20 Mar 2018, at 09:54, Pierre Villard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jorge, > > > > I think this should be carefully documented to remind users that the > > attributes are in memory. Doing what you propose would mean having in > > memory the full content of the flow file as long as the flow file is > > processed in the workflow (unless you remove attributes using > > UpdateAttributes). > > > > Pierre > > > > 2018-03-20 7:55 GMT+01:00 Jorge Machado <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> I would like to change the FlattenJson Procerssor to be possible to > >> Flatten to the attributes instead of Only to content. Is this a good > Idea ? > >> would the PR be accepted ? > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Jorge Machado > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
