Wow.. I dint realize there was a JIRA already. I'm interested and would be happy to contribute my time & efforts on this.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Matt Burgess <mattyb...@apache.org> wrote: > I think is a great idea, I filed a Jira [1] a while ago in case > someone wanted to start working on it (or in case I got a chance). It > mentions ARX but any Apache-friendly implementation is of course > welcome. I think it should be in its own bundle as it is functionality > separate from all our other bundles (and not ubiquitous enough to put > in the standard NAR). > > Glad to hear you're interested in this, please feel free to reach out > with any questions and I too would be happy to review any > contributions. > > Thanks, > Matt > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4492 > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > There's a framework called ARX that could very useful for this. The only > > question you have is how compliant it would be with different sets of > > distinct legal requirements for privacy handling. In the absence of > strong > > legal guidance, I'd say err on the side of complying with health care > > regulations because that's where you're likely to find the clearest > > guidance and established tools. > > > > Ping me on any PR you send. > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sivaprasanna <sivaprasanna...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > With data becoming more critical and substantial to business > development, > > > new stringent regulations & law are getting introduced (GDPR being a > recent > > > example), I've been spending some time lately doing research on data > > > anonymization and after some hefty thinking, I finally decided to go > ahead > > > with the creation of new processor bundle that has processors like > > > 'AnonymizeRecord', 'DeanonymizeRecord' (not quite sure about the name > > > though). Following are my questions: > > > > > > - What do you guys think about these proposed processors? > > > - If the processors are okay to be introduced, are they "standard" > > > enough to get them added to our 'nifi-standard-bundles' module or > is it > > > better to keep it separated much like others like AWS, Azure > bundles, > > > etc. > > > > > > Having said this, I'm very much in the beginning phase with my > research and > > > development efforts so all your inputs & feedback on this one are > greatly > > > appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > - > > > Sivaprasanna > > > >
