Thanks. That's what I thought. I may also do that for the Mongo package because it should cut some space by not duplicating the Mongo driver.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:46 PM Bryan Bende <[email protected]> wrote: > That is fine for the CS implementation, the CS API should be in it's own > NAR. > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:14 PM Mike Thomsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I picked up NIFI-5224, which is for creating a Solr client service, and > was > > wondering if there are any gotchas or down sides to putting the > controller > > service in the same NAR as the processors that will use it. Is there any > > reason I would want to avoid that? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike >
